-
Announcements
-
Welcome! 03/05/2016
Welcome, everyone, to the new 910CMX Community Forums. I'm still working on getting them running, so things may change. If you're a 910 Comic creator and need your forum recreated, let me know and I'll get on it right away. I'll do my best to make this new place as fun as the last one!
-
Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'q&a'.
Found 10 results
-
http://TheHeroesOfCRASH.com Ask me or my characters questions at https://curiouscat.me/heroesofcrash! I told you that there would be a filler and a little something special, so here it is! As I explain in this week's filler, you can ask me or my characters questions (That I may answer as long as they aren't inappropriate, personal, or spoilery) through the Curious Cat website. My username there, of course, is heroesofcrash. Who knows? I may draw up a response. Could make for a fun filler comic sometime in the future when I'm in a pinch...!
-
- curiouscat
- curious cat
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with:
-
http://egscomics.com/comic/qa8-15 Yeah, as predicted, laws of EGS universe can't contain something which would be problematic for some readers ... ... wait, what? Susan "doesn't have an irrelevant name-based affinity for cheerleading magic is because her inherited affinity for magic weaponry took precedence."...does it mean that people can't have two affinities? Because if not for this wording, I would assume that the inherited affinity for magic weaponry would take precedence in giving her spells, but she would still have the name based affinity and may get some cheerleading magic later when already having enough weapon spells ... Also, totally expect that with name-based affinities rare the thing about Will of magic not "getting" some of the puns and missing them would apply. PS: Lisa, don't worry: You are unlikely to get name-based affinity for summoning cupcakes, but you can still get the spell: cupcakes wouldn't be so hard magic you can only get it with affinity.
-
http://egscomics.com/comic/qa8-11 Finally new info! And not only not-really-surprising answer to the teleportation question, but Dan immediately added the resulting loophole for disarming magic. Also, yeah, implanting magic crystal into yourself makes all sort of senses. And I suspect that teleporting out someone's internal organs - heart, for example - is also not possible ... (teleportation magic needs LOTS of safeguards to not be OP ... I mean, unless you WANT it OP). ... wait, wasn't Sarah supposed to RESOLVE this "shrunken curvy catgirl nonsense"? ... not that I'm complaining ...
-
http://egscomics.com/comic/qa8-13 ... also, Dan mentioned on twitter that this will be last week of Q&A. ... somehow, I think my questions will not get addressed ... But back to comics. I think Dan already mentioned Susan's sexuality is autobiographical? On one hand, it means she may not be ace. On the other, it doesn't exactly look good for her threesome with Elliot. Or Catalina. Or both. She probably will be just looking ... Also, of course Dan has sinister political agenda. ... but specifically the bit about trans people "getting it on" transformation seems quite logical. Although I still in first place think it's weird that magic is super safe but can't be used for healing.
-
http://egscomics.com/comic/qa8-12 [space for spoilers] ...That's a pretty dramatic way to demonstrate that Sarah isn't entirely straight. I mean, Grace-Mon-verse Sarah and Diane are in a relationship, and Nanase Craft and Assistant Sarah are on the way to one, but main-universe Sarah is still just coming to terms with her attraction to women. Also this kiss feels very out of the blue; I was not expecting the Q&A versions of the characters to be in different relationships than the main-universe versions...
-
http://egscomics.com/comic/qa8-09 ... I'm not entirely convinced the last two panels were enough to warrant whole page spend on this ... Also, apparently there are still people who were surprised by yesterday's page, as otherwise Dan would receive that list of indicators sooner. (What? Taping my foot is supposed to be relaxation?) (Didn't have problem tuning out people in computer lab ; but I do find hard to sleep with electronics humming around me ... and I sometimes have problems hearing what people are saying which seem more serious than what would match my general hearing ...)
-
http://egscomics.com/comic/qa8-08 Dan talked about this on Twitter the other day, but I have also seen people ask about it before so it makes sense to make it the subject of Q&A, even if it isn't a solid "yes or no" answer.
-
http://egscomics.com/comic/qa8-07 "Guaranteed accidental success" ... well, Voltaire is NOT as omniscient as he might think. ... well, this is definitely VERY important question, unfortunately it's again something we already knew. At least we got little more details about Voltaire's motivation and plan. Although we still don't know if he actively done something making Arthur more likely to argue for change or if Arthur got into that position on his own. Also, there WAS a third seer, although somehow I doubt he would outargument Arthur.
-
http://egscomics.com/comic/qa8-04 Ok, this is at least something about magic, although it is something Dan already said somewhere (not in comics). I'm surprised the fact if the shrinking "tastes spicy" doesn't make a difference. Although, sweet or spicy, I suppose as long as it defies square cube law the height of voice has nothing to do with physics. ... uuuhh, how would shrinking Elliot less make easier to hide anything objectionable?
-
http://egscomics.com/comic/qa8-01 Yeah. Barbarian is bad class for scientist. She should be at least ranger. Somehow I don't believe the axe is real metal. Wait ... Susan has long ears? And what class is SHE? I don't think there are summoners in D&D, and if they are, wouldn't they be subclass of wizard? (Or is this some other game which also has multiclassing? Because in generic fantasy not related to any game, there aren't CLASSes, much less multiclassing.)