• Announcements

    • Robin

      Welcome!   03/05/2016

      Welcome, everyone, to the new 910CMX Community Forums. I'm still working on getting them running, so things may change.  If you're a 910 Comic creator and need your forum recreated, let me know and I'll get on it right away.  I'll do my best to make this new place as fun as the last one!
The Old Hack

Discussion of Military, real or fictional

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Don Edwards said:

Or so they hope.

They seem to be missing the fact that the Ukrainians can just drone attack the barrier and, when it goes down, swarm the fleet.  I don't think the Russian navy has absorbed the realities of drone warfare like their army has.

For that matter, any navy.  The US Navy is still pretty clueless when it comes to drone attacks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, mlooney said:

They seem to be missing the fact that the Ukrainians can just drone attack the barrier and, when it goes down, swarm the fleet.  I don't think the Russian navy has absorbed the realities of drone warfare like their army has.

For that matter, any navy.  The US Navy is still pretty clueless when it comes to drone attacks.

It is my understanding that we have installed some defenses. Probably not enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Darth Fluffy said:

It is my understanding that we have installed some defenses. Probably not enough.

I am sure that a squad of 13 men and a 37mm anti-tank gun will be enough to deter Germany from invading Denmark.

(This was what we actually fielded against the Germans when they crossed the border to Denmark on April 9, 1940. It did not end well. We did manage to take out a Panzer I at the head of the German column, mind you, a loss I am sure completely crippled the future German war effort.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The convicted felon in the Oval Office has decided to build two new battleships for the US Navy.

Battleships.

I am sure they will not at all be obsolete from the moment the keels are laid and I look forward to the new vessels USS Inadvisable and USS Defaulted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Pharaoh RutinTutin said:

 

How much would it cost to haul 2 battle ships out from the moth ball fleet, gold plate them, and mount them in New York harbor? 

 

I don't think they are even in the moth ball fleet any more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyway I was wrong.

It wasn't two battleships.

It was twenty-five.

Twenty-five.

I don't think the US had twenty-five battleships at the height of World War Two.

Trump is a fucking moron and the people who enable him are a disgrace to the United States.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 big cruisers, which is what the ships he is wanting would be called in the US Navy now, might make it through Congress.  25?  No fucking way.  The man is on drugs.  Actually that would explain a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Senator Mike Lee of Utah has just proposed reintroducing letters of marque and reprisal so private US citizens may be empowered to go after enemies of the US. A grand return to the age of piracy on the high seas. There is no possible way this could in any form or shape go wrong! Arrrrrrr!

(Someone mentioned planting something illegal on some billionaire's megayacht and using that as an excuse for seizing it, plundering it and haul it off for selling in some neutral country, and this has caused me to be on the verge of being in favour of this insane idea. Where's my One Piece pirate flag?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding has been that some treaty that the US is party to doesn't allow them.

However, I don't know what treaty that would be. And it's likely that it would only apply to privateering against the ships of other countries party to the treaty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Don Edwards said:

My understanding has been that some treaty that the US is party to doesn't allow them.

And precisely how would that be any sort of constraint on the demented orange howler baboon? It is not exactly as if it has a history of respecting preexisting treaties or agreements of any kind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russian Court Demands $29 Million from Ukrainian Navy Officer for Sinking of Moskva Missile Cruiser

https://militarnyi.com/en/news/russian-court-demands-29-million-from-ukrainian-navy-officer-for-sinking-of-moskva-missile-cruiser/

For some reason it will not let me embed the image, even if I go into source mode.  I think it's on the blog's end to prevent hot linking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Um, has it become accepted norm to bill the enemy for losses you sustain during a war you started? Will we be seeing Japan sue the estate of Admiral Nimitz for the loss of four fleet carriers during the Battle of Midway?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, The Old Hack said:

Um, has it become accepted norm to bill the enemy for losses you sustain during a war you started? Will we be seeing Japan sue the estate of Admiral Nimitz for the loss of four fleet carriers during the Battle of Midway?

No, but Russia isn't at war; they are just doing a “special military action” that is only gonna last 3 days four years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, The Old Hack said:

Um, has it become accepted norm to bill the enemy for losses you sustain during a war you started? Will we be seeing Japan sue the estate of Admiral Nimitz for the loss of four fleet carriers during the Battle of Midway?

Usually such payments are part of the terms of the treaty ending the conflict. Demanding payments mid-conflict via court action rather than direct threat of military action definitely seems new.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ukraine can respond that they are not answerable to a mythical court.

(The court that issued the in-absentia sentence is officially sited in Moscow, but the Ukrainian government has revoked the charter that a predecessor Ukrainian government issued several centuries ago, under which Moscow exists. As a matter of Ukrainian law, Moscow does not exist, so nothing real can be situated there.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now