HarJIT

http://www.egscomics.com/?id=2184

We have had two, separated, "T-Minus", IIRC, although neither were numbered.

“We’re not street, we’re boulevard.” – Matt Gray, 2016, youtube:9a5jY7544wk

Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore.

Why not both?

I think Dan reblogged on Tumblr at some point someone juxtaposing http://www.egscomics.com/?id=871 and http://www.egscomics.com/?id=1587 regarding Susan and family, and asking something like "so what is the truth?" ... I might be misremembering, of course.

"Java and JavaScript are similar like Car and Carpet are similar." -- Greg Hewgill

Do you have... the scar...

https://blog.xkcd.com/2011/03/08/parentheses/ -

The forum system seems to have messed up with the entity-escaping of the apostrophe in the link target: if it fails for anyone, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_paradox_of_the_Grand_Hotel ought to work (with the ' changed to its URL escape before the forum software gets hold of it).

True... although my intention with the fur colours is less a matter of documenting an attribute inherent to the character per se, but primarily documenting information which may be needed by a colourist. Hence what it would be reasonable to colourise a given character's fur to is such a datum. (I previously had my avatar colourised using the one labelled as CAT2, which is the colour which was associated with the specific cat form depicted in its original Patreon-SB appearance. I later calculated compromise colours (I forget how) for the typical fur-colour Tedd seems to fluctuate around, as visible in the strip at the top of that square, and re-colourised the fur to use them (or some illumination thereof) for some reason - I forget precisely why.) You're probably right that it doesn't really belong alongside the others, but I didn't really have a better place to put them, at least not at the time (I created the "Cargo chart" some time afterward).

The sketchbook entry is the one I was referring to, but thanks for the Elliot link. I also forgot about the Werewolf Susan SB. Anyway:

Minor update:

Pencil is the aliased equivalent of the (antialiased) brush tool. The eraser tool can be switched into no-antialiasing mode by ticking the "hard edge" box in its settings ("Tool Options") panel, and antialiasing on the lasso or wand can be turned off by unchecking the "antialiasing" box in its settings panel. On scaling and related transforms, set interpolation to "none".

Likewise. Are you able to screenshot it, perhaps?

https://twitter.com/elgoonishshive/status/721361035580452864

... oh, so that weird Doraemon expression is a "duck-face"? Googling yields an example of what I'm talking about. Edit: Thatis, googling Doraemon duckface.

So like this?

I think this is accurate?

I believe So A Date is concurrent with the latter part of Question Mark and follows immediately from Playing With Dolls (hence Nanase being rushed off).

Any minidisks down there?

http://www.egscomics.com/?id=2176

Dan Shive ‏@dantheshive Apr 6 I'd be less down on labels if they came with objective checklists that one could look at and say "right, okay. All of this checks out." https://twitter.com/dantheshive/status/717723670555168777 Dan Shive ‏@dantheshive Apr 6 "I'm a conservative!" I don't know what you mean by that. It could be anything from voting republican to xenophobic religious extremist. https://twitter.com/dantheshive/status/717724230045999104 Dan Shive ‏@dantheshive "I'm a liberal!" I don't know what you mean by that. It could be anything from voting democrat to marijuana smoking socialist hippie. https://twitter.com/dantheshive/status/717724545528889345 Dan Shive ‏@dantheshive Apr 6 "They're an SJW!" That could mean anything from caring about diversity and social wellness to punching people over assumed bigotry. https://twitter.com/dantheshive/status/717726047504994305 Dan Shive ‏@dantheshive Apr 6 Politically, labels are useful for rallying people to your cause (and keeping them in line) while broadly discrediting the opposition. https://twitter.com/dantheshive/status/717727688878743556 Dan Shive ‏@dantheshive Apr 6 It doesn't encourage detailed discussion or reasoning. It encourages "us vs them" and resistance to change. https://twitter.com/dantheshive/status/717727863420551168 Dan Shive ‏@dantheshive Apr 6 I know talking out against labels can sound like hipster nonsense (hey, another discrediting label!), but there *are* reasons to take issue. https://twitter.com/dantheshive/status/717728210490765314 Dan Shive ‏@dantheshive Apr 6 A sad reality is that "us vs them" is WAY more effective for getting a bunch of people on one side and is likely the "best" strategy. https://twitter.com/dantheshive/status/717729048307191810

Duck-typing.

Thinking of http://www.egscomics.com/?id=1927 perhaps?